The Chairperson of the NGO “Chamber of Patent Attorneys of Kazakhstan”, Tagbergenova M.M., initiated a discussion on the issues of forensic examination of intellectual property objects.

The Chairperson of the NGO “Chamber of Patent Attorneys of Kazakhstan”, Tagbergenova M.M., initiated a discussion on the issues of forensic examination of intellectual property objects. In this regard, the RSE “National Institute of Intellectual Property” organized a Round Table with the participation of patent attorneys of the NGO “Chamber of Patent Attorneys of Kazakhstan”.

On August 15, 2025, a round table was held at which the following issues raised by Tagbergenova M.M. were discussed:

1. What is the difference between the “Methodology of forensic examination of designations registered as means of individualization, declared for registration, as well as used without registration, in order to establish the presence (absence) of their identity and / or similarity to the point of confusion” of 01/29/2024 and those that existed previously?

2. Current practice in cases related to the forensic examination of means of individualization in court proceedings.

3. Approaches to certification of forensic experts in specialty 31.1. “Forensic examination of designations of means of individualization”.

4. Implementation (realization) of the new Methodology “forensic examination of designations registered as means of individualization, applied for registration, as well as used without registration, in order to establish the presence (absence) of their identity and/or similarity to the point of confusion”.

The issues raised have become especially relevant in connection with the controversial approach to conducting forensic examination on intellectual property issues. The round table was a major advance in this matter. Work on further improving forensic examination of intellectual property objects continues.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *